Talk:The Son (2002 film)

Belgium: Cinema Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the joint Belgian cinema task force.

Film: French / Belgian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Belgian cinema task force.

Wikipedia is not a review site

The tone of this article is way off. It reads like it was copy & pasted from some imdb user review. The Dardenne Brothers page is also written in this way. Somebody more capable than me should try sorting it out Knowing you (talk) 23:32, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced but right!

I don't understand User:Kollision'removing at 13.28 on 7 August 2010. I agree with him the sentences are unsourced but it is possible to find a source on these sentences. Even in the Luc Dardenne's book. José Fontaine (talk) 16:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know sources can be found because I found them while checking to see if the section was original research. It wasn't but I removed the section because it was very poorly put together. For starters, the section is confused whether it is a 'Themes' section or a 'Critical response' section, some of the information belongs in the former, some in the latter. Having both types of information in one section is confusing, especially when some of the quotes are opinions. Secondly, the section is simply three or four quotes stuck next to each other, there is no way that is going to work. There needs to be some text before or after the quote to introduce or explain the theme behind the quote; or the information should be internalized and rewritten in the editor's own words. Some quoting would be acceptable, but never an entire section composed of quotes. Whenever there are quotes there also needs to be attribution (eg. Bob said...) so that the reader knows who said it. Take a look at Changeling (film)#Themes for a good Themes section - see how it isn't composed entirely of quotes. In the state the section was, the information made little sense, anyone reading it would just end up baffled and confused. That is why I removed it. - Kollision (talk) 05:39, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Son (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5r92dOFlB to http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/12/the_best_films_of_the_decade.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]