Talk:The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants 2

Notability

If the film is apparently already filming, doesn't that mean that it's already entered production, and is thus notable enough for the article to remain? Vintagejonny 05:54, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i was surprised to see this deleted and asked the admin to restore it and move it to the right place. Ed Wood's Wig 00:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

format

there is a line missing in the table for cast/characters next to "Shohreh Aghdashloo" - needs to be fixed i think... Tweety bui (talk) 06:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this relevant?

"The sequel of "The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants" is the similar plot of Shrek 2." I'm not sure a) how this is relevant and, b) How this would even be known. Unless someone has a source for information then it shouldn't be added. The ruggedly handsome pig-tamer's princess (talk) 23:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure calling Lena's interest in an African American boy from her drawing class "a severe case of jungle fever" is appropriate or politically correct. Where I come from, that's considered a racial slur. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.144.26.229 (talk) 03:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---_____ I agree with you and deleted the jungle fever part.217.87.2.12 (talk) 07:39, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The character of the art model is not African. He is American. I do not see what race has anything to do with this synopsis. - J Whisler

Plot synopsis?

The whole thing is extremely long and detailed, not to mention incomplete. Is there any way we can make it shorter and more to the point? WickedWitchoftheWest 09:44, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I haven't seen the entire movie, but it looks like a grade schooler wrote the synopsis. There are a lot of syntax errors and redundancies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.56.116.105 (talk) 15:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]