Talk:The Sheaf

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

IMO Capitalist Piglet should have its own article.

        -it does now: Capitalist Piglet, should we add a reference to the main Sheaf entry about it? Akiracee (talk) 21:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then add a page. Someone keeps deleting this entry and I have no idea what to do.

None of this stuff has any citations. It's a very detailed article, and there are no links to other sources verifying its veracity. (I realize that most everything stated here is true, but this is still the way Wiki works). And perhaps there is too much focus on the Capitalist Piglet scandal. --Aylwinatrix Dec 27, 06

Yeah, I agree. In the meantime, I edited the Capitalist Piglet article. I snipped out the bits about supposed Christian hypocrisy re: Muslim cartoons. Real or not, Wikipedia is not the place for this. I snipped out a couple of other violations of NPOV. --Smo December 28, 06

Capitalist Piglet

Definitely warrants mention in the article. It achieved international attention and resulted in the forced resignation of the editor-in-chief. The comic is arguably more notable than the paper itself. --96.52.132.224 (talk) 09:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I went ahead and started a page for Capitalist Piglet. Akiracee (talk) 21:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Sheaf Alumni

I know there are lots more prominent alumni out there. Can someone give me a hand thinking of them? Akiracee (talk) 20:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about other alumni, but I took out Roy Romanow because he did not work at the Sheaf. He said so himself, and if that is not sufficient evidence, an internet search will reveal nothing about it either. --128.233.97.62 (talk) 20:29, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty, but does a career in journalism qualify as notable or prominent? My own view is no, meaning the list needs to be pared down.AJMacPherson (talk) 23:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]