Talk:The Seeing Stone

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Children's literature Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Welcome to my First Article!

This is my very first original article here on Wikipedia (not counting minor edits and such), so feel free to offer any tips or ideas for improvements you can think of. I haven't finished yet, and will continue to expand it as I go along, mostly in the plot section, which will become much more comprehensive. Oh, and if you haven't, check out the book; it's quite good.

Helwer7 01:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good for a first go - have a look at WP:NOVELS for further ideas. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 14:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KevinCrossleyHolland TheSeeingStone.jpg

Image:KevinCrossleyHolland TheSeeingStone.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This rationale is skimpy, maybe inadequate? --P64 (talk) 18:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Title

first of multiple sections in one session

WorldCat libraries are split about cataloguing this as Arthur: The Seeing Stone (which the original front cover supports) or The Seeing Stone (US library of congress, although the first US ed. used the original cover). Most of the foreign-language editions begin "Arthur". Soon after I discovered this (very late) i added the second formal reference to WorldCat "Formats and Editions" and saved the article in a split state --mentioning both titles without identifying either one as primary.

We should go with the first edition title page if possible. Second choice may be the British national library (not LCC) If not that, the British national library.

--P64 (talk) 18:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

second of two sections posted at once

Simply for the fact of the 2001 Guardian Prize i have given a formal reference to "Guardian Children's Fiction Prize 2001" at guardian.co.uk, which is woeful underuse. That "top page", as I call it, incorporates links to much contemporary coverage by The Guardian in print or online. --including the first four of the following but not the fifth. Here are direct links that approach formal references.

Prize fiction: Claire Phipps talks to last year's winner {Jacqueline Wilson} about judging the 2001 Guardian children's book award, and Julia Eccleshare shares the panel's views on the longlist

Claire Phipps and Julia Eccleshare

The Guardian, Monday 9 July 2001 20.42 EDT

Once and future king [review of The Seeing Stone]

The Guardian, Monday 10 September 2001 12.52 EDT

Arthur returns to take Guardian Children's Fiction Prize

guardian.co.uk, Friday 28 September 2001 06.13 EDT

Arthur reborn: Claire Armitstead talks to Kevin Crossley-Holland, winner of the Guardian Children's Fiction Prize

The Guardian, Friday 28 September 2001 21.15 EDT

The winner: Arthur: The Seeing Stone by Kevin Crossley-Holland

Claire Armitstead and Julia Eccleshare

The Guardian, Tuesday 9 October 2001 06.33 EDT

Although I haven't yet read them, I daresay Certainly these articles include material with substantial value here. --P64 (talk) 18:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Seeing Stone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120310093112/http://www.cllc.org.uk/gwasanaethau-services/plant-children/gwobrau-prizes/tir-na-nog/rhestr-list to http://www.cllc.org.uk/gwasanaethau-services/plant-children/gwobrau-prizes/tir-na-nog/rhestr-list

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]