Talk:The Sea Hawk
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Sea Hawk article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Sea Hawk. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Sea Hawk at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Hawk of the sea?
[edit]What exactly is a "hawk of the sea" (according to the novelist)? I see that hawk in the English language sometimes has a lot more general connotations than hök from my native Swedish. Then I find the osprey often has been called "sea hawk". But the cover picture of the novel doesn't look like an osprey. Someone has a clue?--Paracel63 (talk) 17:28, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hello, Paracel63. "Sea hawk" is an alternate term for an osprey. I think the fault lies with the artist, who was going for a more romanticized look than perhaps an osprey would provide. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Also, Sabatini himself: The Sea Hawk is a lot catchier than The Osprey — HarringtonSmith (talk) 18:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
SEA HAWK - Saker-Al-Baher
[edit]One has to understand that the title is designed to attract readers with an exotic term
In the Arabic I know Saker-Al-Baher actually means to "CLOSE-THE-SEA"
So go figure ..
In some Arabic dialects HAWK == هوك (HOOK) and FALCON == فالكون (FALKOON) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Al.Qudsi (talk • contribs) 03:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
BTW I read the book when I was 6 or 7 -- many many moons ago! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Al.Qudsi (talk • contribs) 03:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Plot summary
[edit]What is the suggestion for editing or redrafting this plot summary? Personally I can never see the point of a full summary, which is bound to contain spoilers. I would have thought you just need a list of the characters and their roles, followed by a short account of the action, not giving away important details. Valetude (talk) 20:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)