Jump to content

Talk:The Sacrifice (1986 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please separate spoiler and non-spoiler elements

[edit]

Please separate spoiler and non-spoiler elements! I love the fact that Wikipedia warns the reader of "giving away" the endings of movies, etc. It is possible to review any movie without doing so. Also it's good to have the endings described for those who have seen it or don't mind knowing the ending before they see it. My friend says I must see this movie. However, not having seen it, I don't want to read this article until the spoiler elements are separated and I can read the non-spoiler parts. Could someone who has seen it please take all the non-spoiler parts and put them above the spoiler warning? Korky Day 22:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've inserted an "end of spoiler" note after the hot stuff. But it's a bit awkward in this article, as there is a substantial spoiler in the "Production notes" section, and it really has to be included. Staecker 01:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How can you *spoil* a movie that's total shite?! 82.28.80.97 (talk) 18:20, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

[edit]

The synopsis contains info on "one interpretation" of the film. Is this a common response or the theory of a random Wikipedian? If the former, please provide a source.Cop 663 01:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sacrificebritish1.jpg

[edit]

Image:Sacrificebritish1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 10:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Off

[edit]

The article had "drive him off" which I changed to "drive off with him." "Drive him off", unambiguously means "chase him away" in English. It never means "put him in an ambulance and drive away with him." If the film does indeed show him being chased over the horizon, then please revert my edit.Nick Beeson (talk) 19:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Sacrifice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]