Talk:The Problem Solverz/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Johanna (talk · contribs) 15:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Third on my "to review" list. Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 15:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How's everything going, Johanna? 23W 23:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@23W: Sorry, I had other stuff going on, and then I decided to wait until the third round of the GA Cup began. Here are my comments. Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 00:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Instead of "from Cartoon Network", I would say "which aired on Cartoon Network".
You can remove "problem-solving" as that's what detectives are by definition
"Jones is a member of the art collective Paper Rad." This sentence comes out of nowhere, and I don't see how it's relevant.
I notice nothing about the series' cancellation from CN's or Netflix's schedules, both in the lead and the article. Could you include something?
What do you mean that the characters were created "as a response"?
"For television Jones..." how is this relevant, particularly to what you were just discussing?
It's up to you, but I wouldn't add that Adult Swim is the nightly division of the network.
"The plan was pulled off..." A lot of things wrong here. First, this phrasing is informal. Also, what "plan", and who was involved? I'm confused.
"Writing was the lengthiest facet" I'm a bit confused
It seems like critics have noted the bright art style, but unless a specific one has made the comparison to Paper Rad, I would remove that part from the image caption.
Remove the clause "Rather than battle it" and separate the two remaining independent clauses with a semicolon.
I would add the critical consensus back at the top of "Reception".
Your refs are impeccable. For an article of this length, I don't think I've seen such consistently reliable and well-formatted sources. None of them are broken. Nice job on that!
- Johanna I think I've provided for all comments. Thank you so much for reviewing! I think my referencing skills are all muscle memory at this point, heh. 23W 01:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@23W: Wonderful work. Pass. Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 02:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]