Talk:The Prince of Tides

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Thank you

The previous contents have been purged for public decency. You can thank me later. Viewer

DIVIDE ARTICLE?

SHOULD THIS ARTICLE BE DIVIDED INTO A MOVIE ARTICLE AND A NOVEL ARTICLE? SORRY ABOUT THE CAPS, MY CAPS LOCK KEY IS BROKEN. Demosthenes 1 23:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Princeoftides.jpg

Image:Princeoftides.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FRENCH VERSION?

User comments about "bias" (removed from The Prince of Tides, "Reception" section)

User Comment 1: To the wikipedia staff, surely the above is somewhat of a review by the author who it appears has also read the novel and does not represent how the film was received at the time and should therefore be considered bias? 81.96.205.134

User Comment 2: What was written above is not biased, he/she is just letting you know how Conroy purists reacted to the film since it left out major elements of the novel. 24.45.21.134

Please note: Discussion is welcomed and encouraged. However in the future, please use this "Talk" page for comments of this nature. Kindly sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Thanks so much, and we look forward to your continued use of Wikipedia. LA Movie Buff (talk) 18:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed "sic" from Mark Canton's comment as there was nothing wrong with it 217.33.154.66 (talk) 09:25, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Prince of Tides. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080220094354/http://www.barbra-archives.com/Films/streisand_princeoftides.html to http://www.barbra-archives.com/Films/streisand_princeoftides.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]