Talk:The Potato Eaters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands

Untitled

Beware, there are two versions of this painting. Both are done by van Gogh.

First of all, there is a version in the KMM (Kroller Muller Museum) in Park de Hoge Veluwe. And another, the variant, is part of the permanent collection in the VGM (van Gogh Museum) in Amsterdam.This paiting is deticated to Corey Torjesen

http://www.vangoghmuseum.nl/collection/catalog/vgmpainting.asp?ARTID=1&SEL=1

Besides that, the Boymans Van Beuningen Museum in Rotterdam has also some van Gogh's from the Aardappeleters-period.

Well, and I have just pasted the link to an image from Wikimedia Commons which shows the lithograph executed 1885 in Nuenen, a bit before the final version.

But the link does not wwork properly: The title does not show, and the image is too large. Please help! --R.P.D. 17:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've tidied this up a bit and added a section 'Influence of the Hague School'. Rinpoche (talk) 00:58, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's the point of the left hand study? It's very poor and there are no details for it. I'd rather have the nice litho mentioned above. There's also a high resolution Kroller-Muller in the commons but that's just a repro from a T&H sort thing. Will I be shot dead if I switch to the litho a few days hence? Rinpoche (talk) 02:17, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leave the study and add the litho as a third image - it's an important seminal work...Modernist (talk) 05:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the nicer of the two lithograph images in WikiCommons but I can't relate the impression to any of those listed by David Brooks on his site. Anyone can do that appreciated.Rinpoche (talk) 19:27, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Potato Eaters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120309044045/http://www.kmm.nl/object/KM%20109.982/The-potato-eaters?artist=Vincent%20van%20Gogh%20(1853%20-%201890)&characteristic=&characteristic_type=Painting&van=0&tot=0&start=0&fromsearch=1 to http://www.kmm.nl/object/KM%20109.982/The-potato-eaters?artist=Vincent%20van%20Gogh%20%281853%20-%201890%29&characteristic=&characteristic_type=Painting&van=0&tot=0&start=0&fromsearch=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:36, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

It would be helpful to know how the critics received the painting. This is touched on, but I've read elsewhere that other critics during van Gogh's lifetime were harsh toward the painting. Why? And why is it now referred as a masterpiece? Simple because van Gogh painted it? Lashdown1 (talk) 12:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it was exhibited during his lifetime at all, like most of his works. Johnbod (talk) 14:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, perhaps it was, in a gallery. Johnbod (talk) 14:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]