Talk:The One Where Rachel Smokes

The One Where Rachel Smokes has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 28, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 22, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that two scenes of the Friends episode "The One Where Rachel Smokes" appear only in the DVD version?

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage / Friends Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Friends task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

DYK nomination

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The One Where Rachel Smokes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 19:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture: needs a better NFCC#8 Rationale just in case
Production: "She publicly asserted her intention to quit in the past and even turned to hypnosis, with the help from co-star Lisa Kudrow, who suggested a hypnotist" Repetition of hypnosis
Cultural References: "…can be heard played at…" should be "can be heard playing at"
Reception: "The reviewer criticized… Moreover, it…" The genders don't match. I wouldn't say reviewer, I'd just say 'review', then the problem is solved
Reception: This section needs to seriously be bulked up a bit. Only one review is out there? I'm sure there are others somewhere…

On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 22:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have addressed concerns I believe. I could only manage to find one other review, conisdering there wasn't any newspaper reviews available. Thanks. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 23:28, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I does indeed look better now. I will pass.--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:30, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]