Talk:The One Percent Doctrine

Prose

This is a non-fiction book, but the article appears to be written as a novel or fictional work. I can't put my finger on what to change, but I think the "Story" heading should be something different, and the article should be written as everything "according to the book" or "according to Suskind" (whether placed once at the beginning, or sporadically through the prose), and not use "apparently" or "seemingly" to descrube disputed claims from the book. Newnam 18:00, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Onepercentdoc.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Onepercentdoc.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]