Talk:Occultation (Islam)

Islam Top‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Top‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

72.188.118.58 (talk) 23:44, 14 July 2020 (UTC)The article should be renamed to Occultation (Shia Islam) or Occultation (Shi'ism). This will make it less ambigious.[reply]

The Occultation

I note the sentence: "During this period, from 874-914 AD, the deputies represented him and acted as agents between him and his followers." yet thereafter all references are to the year 941 AD. Have I misunderstood, or is there a typographical error here, please? Dawright12 (talk) 12:08, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 September 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Occultation (Islam) — Amakuru (talk) 15:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Occultation → ? – Per WP:THE articles should not start with "The"; using one to distinguish Occultation from The Occultation is doubly bad. Possible alternatives are disambiguators Occultation (Islam) or Occultation (Shia Islam) or other; or the Arabic name Ghaybah. jnestorius^(talk) 15:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support moving away from the current title, since for most English speakers it's not sufficient to disambiguate the subject from other occultations. I'd suggest Occultation of the Mahdi for the new title since that's what it's about. 64.105.98.115 (talk) 22:24, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support removal of "The" per WP:THE. Considering other-language wikis (ar-wiki, for example, uses a title that translates as "Occultation (theology)") and WP:UE, I think I'd go for Occultation (Islam). Also, a few sections down the page, other denominations speak about the occultation of other persons, so I'd rather not pick the IP's suggestion. --HyperGaruda (talk) 09:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support moving away from the current title, Occultation (Islam) or Occultation of the Mahdi both acceptable. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Definition

The page uses “occultation” to define “occultation”. 2600:1017:B80D:812E:2931:4CD9:11F7:40D0 (talk) 10:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New edits

The new edits are intended to address the following issues, among other things.

The article has lots of unsourced or poorly sourced content.
Extinct Shia sects can be summarized into "Other views" so as not to divert attention from the existing branches.
There doesn't seem to be a good reason for including Bahai views in a distinctively Shia article. Same for the Druze.
"Secular democracy during Occultation" is a large section that promotes a particular political view, and it's misplaced and irrelevant here at best.
"Scholarly observations" looks like the type of place where opposing editors would go back and forth and off-topic. It's hardly justified here. Albertatiran (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is the issue

@Albertatiran your attitude makes people not want to contribute to Wikipedia.

you should at least show that you appreciate the work of the fellow editor by explaining what could be done to improve it rather than discard the whole thing Belomaad (talk) 13:56, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Much time is spent undoing the damage that you do by repeatedly and untiringly inserting sectarian and often poorly-sources propaganda into various articles. Appreciation is reserved for editors who have good faith and it's very difficult to assume that about you, considering the pattern in your edits. Albertatiran (talk) 07:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]