Talk:The Nation's Health

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I am trying to create a fact only encyclopedic entry for wikipedia about "The Nation's Health", a monthly periodical. I am reviewing my content and deleting any information that may seem promotional. Please provide me with feedback for any other material I should exclude, because I feel this entry is valuable and educational.

You have certainly expanded the article since I flagged it. However, it still contains a high degree of puffery (unsourced claims like "the country’s leading source" and "easy-to-understand") as well as material like subscription information which is more in line with an advertisement than with an encyclopedia article. Beyond that, the only source listed for information is the publisher itself, which qualifies as a self-published source; is this publication is truly notable then there should be third-party reliable sources discussing it. --Nat Gertler (talk) 21:49, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]