Talk:The Myelin Project

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Myelin Project article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Myelin Project. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Myelin Project at the Reference desk.

Medicine: Neurology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force.

Balance

The inspiration section mostly repeats the article on the film and should be reduced. More interesting would be details of the projects and treatments funded by the project. Rod57 (talk) 01:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No Sources Cited

This article should be cleaned up. It cites no sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.130.68 (talk) 04:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Results and achievements?

Is any results from this project? What main problem there are now? --Nashev (talk) 22:40, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DEPROD

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past with the comment:
Although this could've simply been redirected to Augusto's and Michaela's article, there's still nothing actually convincing of any independent notability apart from any mentions as part of events thus there's nothing to keep history-wise, my own searches have found nothing better than mere mentions. At best, it can be redirected to their article after deletion especially considering the rather advertorial nature of the contents.
It was contested by Kvng (talk · contribs) on 2016-07-01 with the comment:
Evidence of notability: [1], [2], [3]. ~Kvng (talk) 01:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kvng: Highbeam.com was shut down in 2018, so I don't know what was at those links, and the Myelin Project was folded into another organization five years ago. The article still references only the project's own self-published material (now mostly dead links). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 18:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source credibility

I think the source links below just go to the same scam website 208.71.74.8 (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]