Talk:The Mouse That Roared (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of The Mouse That Roared was copied or moved into The Mouse That Roared (film) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

The Mouse on the Moon

Before we have any more flip-flopping on the position of the sequel info, can we come to a landing on it here? I'd suggest—in line with the edits of MarnetteD and Robsinden—that it should be lower down in the article, rather than up in the lead. There are two reasons for this: firstly the article is about The Mouse That Roared, not The Mouse on the Moon and secondly the lead is supposed to show only information contained in the article body (although it's a more grey area with such a short article). If this article is developed incrementally there is a possibility that it would remain in the lead, orphaned from the rest of the information and with no other reference (or source) attached to it. Aside from that, it's a one sentence paragraph—something that should be avoided where possible. - SchroCat (^ • @) 11:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I indicated, we place sequels/earlier films at the end of the lead in lieu of preceding/following in the infobox - a situation from last year I'm sure MarnetteD will recall well. We were told putting it there was to provide easy navigation for readers since such info would no longer be in the infobox. The fact it's a one sentence paragraph in a stub article is typical and not a problem. You'll see it there in many WP film articles, whether extrensive or just stubs. It's supposed to be added to the leads of any films where it's still missing. - Gothicfilm (talk) 12:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We said that they "could go" in the lede not that they must. As can be seen here MOS:FILM#Lead section there is no mention that sequels must be mentioned in the lede, or even that they should be. Until you have changed the consensus there you should not claim that such a situation exists to be applied here. Next, this is not a stub article. I cannot understand this reasoning that readers can't or won't scroll through an entire article. It seems that current discussion is fine with the mention in a separate section. MarnetteD | Talk 15:29, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]