This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
The contents of the Ryan Nicodemus page were merged into The Minimalists on 08 March 2014. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Planning on merging two WP:BIO articles I was working on for Ryan Nicodemus and Joshua Fields Millburn with this article. Most of the information available covers both authors and the pages are very redundant at this point (co-authored books, shared interviews, tour together, etc). This would make for a stronger, single article instead of three start-class articles that share a lot of the same information. Please feel free to help me with this!!!Chris Moore (talk) 12:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Every source except the one in the Dayton City Paper and the Missoulian are to themselves. The WSJ source is a bare mention. Are these folks even notable? --valereee (talk) 12:04, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
On further investigation, it appears that literally the entire support for these folks' notability is in the 'Further reading' section. This article needs to be completely rewritten using the first four sources (the LA source is a blog containing an interview, you can't even tell which person is being quoted.) All the self-sourcing needs to go away or be used only for noncontroversial facts. --valereee (talk) 12:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've stripped the article of all the self-sourced stuff. There's plenty to use in the further reading section; I may be back but truly this isn't a topic I care about deeply so it may be a while. Anyone else who's interested, have at it. --valereee (talk) 13:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here are several additional sources for filling out this article:
