Talk:The Mail on Sunday
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Was not allowed the Sunday Mail name (info is already in the Sunday Mail page on Wikipedia)
[edit]Obviously the norm is that a Sunday edition of a newspaper merely has "Sunday" replacing "Daily" in the title - Sunday Times, Sunday Telegraph, Sunday Express, Sunday Mirror, etc.
The Daily Mail wanted that norm followed, but launched its Sunday version (for some reason waiting until the 1980's when others had done it decades earlier) by which time a newspaper called The Sunday Mail already existed in Scotland - and so a different name for it had to be found - hence The Mail On Sunday.
Re the Sunday Mail page on Wikipedia;
"It should not be confused with The Mail on Sunday; the Daily Mail was unable to use the title Sunday Mail when it launched a Sunday edition in 1982 because of the Scottish paper."
Source - https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Sunday_Mail_(Scotland)#History
Both newspaper pages on Wikipedia should carry that info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.210.174 (talk) 13:39, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 03:57, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm suggesting moving this page to The Mail on Sunday as this is the full title. Pafcool2 (talk) 17:14, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Agree It is also the name on their masthead and in line with WP to include the definite article. The software disallowed my attempt. Philip Cross (talk) 17:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support based on masthead. Compulsions70 (talk) 17:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, but Mail on Sunday has to stay as a redirect to The Mail on Sunday. Someone tried to make Mail on Sunday (album) the main target for this name, which is just ridiculous. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support from the Mail
[edit]If I had had the kind of "support" the Conservative Party has allegedly "invariably had" from the Daily Mail, I would cut my throat and have done with it.
82.10.145.63 (talk) 13:41, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Sections
[edit]Why has the ammendement made to the sections of the newspaper been altered back to what it was before it was updated, by an American contributor, based on the sections displayed in the picture? This amendement was made by someone who lives in the UK, who actually takes the paper every Sunday and who knows that what was listed there before, are not the current sections, which are Review, Sport and the You and Live magazines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.213.238 (talk) 17:34, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on The Mail on Sunday. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080209170407/http://media.guardian.co.uk:80/presspublishing/table/0,,2239277,00.html to http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/table/0,,2239277,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Roller skating in first edition
[edit]I think this might actually be roller hockey, and a match between British and Argentinian teams in Lisbon (not the Netherlands) which obviously was newsworthy beyond the minor status of the sport itself. Scroll to the end here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGd_z5g0Zsg - there are microfilms on open display at the British Library, but I can't get there very often and have other stuff to check which means more to me. RobinCarmody (talk) 23:11, 14 April 2019 (UTC)