Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom/GA1

GA Review

Closed per request of the reviewer. The Night Watch (talk) 01:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk · contribs) 05:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, this is gonna be fun. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 05:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TrademarkedTWOrantula Just a nudge :) The Night Watch (talk) 15:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Man, I completely forgot about this review... TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 17:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TrademarkedTWOrantula do you plan to still look at this? No worries if you are too busy or are not interested in reviewing the article anymore, you can close the review if you would like. The Night Watch (talk) 22:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Got this dumb project I'm occupied with. It involves Peter Griffin and the Gold Rush. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 22:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No edit wars have occurred in the last month. Development is at a steady pace.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Cover art and gameplay screenshot images are tagged with the correct copyright status and are provided with a relevant fair use rationale. Image of Aonuma is under a CC Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany license.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Cover art is clearly necessary. Gameplay screenshot shows a crucial part of the gameplay. Feeling uncertain about the Aonuma image, but I'll allow it.
	7. Overall assessment.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.