Talk:The Last Mountain

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Appalachia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Netflix streaming

At present, WP policies regarding pay services prevent the mention of streaming availability through Netflix. But it does seem this info would have value to users of the Wiki, just as dvd availability has. As thee are multiple streaming services available legally, would it not be prudent to offer streanming availability info in film articles? Bustter (talk) 15:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Mathis

Are Eric Mathis's criticisms of the film notable enough to be cited? I find the citation rather misleading. I followed the link and it seems the two criticsms--that the film "paradoxically maintains.." whatever/mumble-jumbo, something about destructive paradigms that doesnt make sense to me; and in particular his calling the CRMW wind study misleading--are just tossed out, with no explanation whatsoever. Unless I'm blind. Can anyone expand (or rather, show where Mr. Mathis expands) on either of his criticisms? If not, it just seems rather unworthy of mention IMO

I'm not trying to purge criticism of the film. I would have less objection even if, say, a coal industry insider was cited, so long as the criticism had some meat to it. Even if I personally though the "meat" was rotten, self-serving, and completely unfounded; as long as it's noteworthy and substantial criticism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.57.8.102 (talk) 00:34, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]