Jump to content

Talk:The Knickerbocker Hotel/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments

[edit]
  • Move the short description to the top of the article.
  • Also move the "use mdy dates" note below "distinguish".
  • Add a comma after "major renovations in 1980".
  • Add a comma after "another renovation in 2001".
  • I think a hyphen should go between "similar looking".
  • "entrance which takes" → "entrance that takes"
  • "converted an office building" → "converted into an office building"
  • "laundry facility was also" → "laundry facility were also"
  • Remove the hyphen between "safe-deposit".
  • "developed with commercial purposes" - shouldn't this be "for commercial purposes"?
  • Check for citation ordering [2][1][1][2]
  • Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • Is the New York Post reference necessary if the statement is already covered? (WP:NYPOST)
  • PR Newswire is marked as unreliable (WP:PRNEWSWIRE) for lack of editorial oversight.
  • Wikilink David W. Dunlap, Christopher Gray, Florence Fabricant, and Meyer Berger.

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks. I've done all of these. Epicgenius (talk) 17:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.