Talk:The Jimmy Timmy Power Hour

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was No consensus to delete. This needs references or it should fail its next AfD.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Animation: American / Films / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Television: Episode coverage / Nickelodeon Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force.

Dates

I doubt the TV and DVD dates are so far appart...

Fourth Nicktoons crossover?

If this was the fourth crossover, what was the third crossover?

And what were the other two? -- Rubber cat 06:37, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rugrats Go Wild! is all I can come up with. The original claim was apparently added here by User:Pikawil, who appears to be still around, but I don't care enough to bug him about it. --DocumentN (talk) 06:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Series

Who agrees that it should be a series

Something like that should not be on a Wikipedia talk page. And sign your posts with four tides. Internetcrazy 12:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canon?

Is the Jimmy/Timmy trilogy canon or is it a gimmick? 68.165.173.217 22:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for improvement

1) Shorten the summary section by a LOT.

2) Outright delete the Goofs and Trivia section. Lots42 20:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

afd

Was the result of this AfD really "keep"? It looks more like "no concensus", to me. I don't see how this is notable, and it's all original research. Why are such articles kept? -- Mikeblas (talk) 11:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, I have fixed the template to show the true result of the AfD. 1 != 2 15:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel. Brabbel!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.73.51.21 (talk) 21:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Goofs

The goofs as it is make little sense. At the very least, it seems the goof applies to the -second- Power Hour movie. Lots42 (talk)

Add articles for the other two

The articles for numbers 2 and 3 were deleted for seemingly no reason, and now redirect to the page of the first one. Please fix this and make sure it doesn't happen again.76.83.246.11 (talk) 02:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]