Talk:The Informant!

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Which plot is this?

The "plot" given in this article is from The Informant (book), which is an article formerly about the movie, then renamed to be about the book, then edited to be about the book, then copy-and-pasted back into this new article about the movie later, then edited some more. Citations (which are sparse) come from both book reviews and movie news. It is unclear whether the "plot" given follows the layout of the nonfiction book, the content of the movie script, or a general summary of the historical facts. It doesn't seem to me that the movie and book are going to contain exactly the same amount and balance of information — the text in the article is either based on one work or the other, or neither, and I can't tell which. It should be removed or overhauled on the article that it doesn't match. In theory, any text that doesn't cite whether it matches one or the other is subject to removal, but I wanted to give someone a heads-up in case someone is willing to correct it instead. --Closeapple (talk) 04:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please fix the plot section

this is a movie that hasn't come out yet so the plot given could be incorrect. also if it is true there needs to be some sort of spoiler tag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.88.130.82 (talk) 23:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New plot summary was writtten for the upcoming movie

A new plot summary was written for the movie, a shorter one with citations.ReadQT (talk) 23:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quote from Gillgian Island?

When the Informant claims to be "0014"-twice as smart as "007"-isnt that line from a Gilligans Island spoof of "007" movies? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.126.88 (talk • contribs) 18:33, September 21, 2009

Your may be's...

on the page are somehow plausible; but told from the end; it#s another story: A male chatterbox; willing to work with the FBI; working on lusin; earns for himself 11 mio bucks. How to pop the firm and the FBI.It was yesterday on german tv visible.And...the socalled "bipolar disorder" seems to me a quite normal actor identity. Has somebody problems with (h)air?!--Ai-mu-mu (talk) 15:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hyperlinked ‘£’

On the box office section, is the hyperlink for the pound sign (£) necessary? if so, shouldn’t the dollar sign ($) be hyperlinked as well. If not, it should be removed. Joopfoop (talk) 22:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]