Talk:The Human Bean

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Human Bean article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on February 24, 2020. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Edit war

The warring editors haven't communicated much. Please figure out acceptable article contents here, while the article is fully protected. —EncMstr (talk) 06:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's rather random. The original editor was blocked for not paying attention, and has several messages of "please stop removing the speedy deletion tag" on their talk page (I suspect it to be a her). Second, I've not edit warred, and neither has anyone else (except for the original author in question, because those are very likely sockpuppets) in attempting to see the article improved, I myself having reached my third revision last night before going to bed and then subsequently being reverted after that. Third, I am merely trying to remove the spammy nature of the current article, which was seeing it repeatedly tagged with speedy deletion tags and other things as well as by stubbing it. I'm fairly certain the handful of editors who were online last night on IRC could back me up in this, as well as policy and guideline (particularly WP:Spam) in my attempts to improve the article.

Please actually take a look at the full edit history next time in detail. This is not an edit war. --Izno (talk) 14:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The original editor was blocked for 15 minutes, apparently to get her attention. It didn't look like there was effective communication, though that looks quite one-sided now. That means I overreacted, partly due to the late hour I reviewed it, and partly due to my difference engine being slightly overwhelmed by the flip-flop changes, making it look worse than it is. Using the Wikipedia diff, it looks like a straightforward WP:advert versus good faith WP:NPOV dispute. I've dropped it to semi-protection since Sarah.love08 (talk · contribs) won't be autoconfirmed for 3 more days. Sorry for the misunderstanding. —EncMstr (talk) 17:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine. If I had woken up to find it in such a manner, I would have unknowingly broken 3rr (instead, I've ignored the rule in an attempt to attempt to save the article!). We'll see if this version sticks for a bit until I can add some citations and such. --Izno (talk) 17:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Telling us why it's notable wouldn't hurt either. :) --Deadly∀ssassin 22:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But that wasn't why it was getting CSD tagged. It was getting csd tagged for g11, not a7. :p --Izno (talk) 02:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent) You make your choices, you takes your chances. :) --Deadly∀ssassin 03:08, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Obviously the same company, with one version looking like a decent article, but looks like a PR job. I propose a simple redirect, copying the few sourced sentences over and integrating them into this version. Aboutmovies (talk) 00:27, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the merge tag. It appears that The Human Bean Company already redirects here. WTF? (talk) 14:59, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Human Bean. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120220112448/http://www.thehumanbean.com/Page.asp?NavID=124 to http://www.thehumanbean.com/Page.asp?NavID=124

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:53, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Locations!?!?

It is 144 or over 300

Why is New Mexico listed twice among the states that have locations… 2601:283:300:22AA:601D:FE78:3AFD:D1FD (talk) 02:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]