Talk:The Hugo Winners
This article was nominated for deletion on 6 September 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the The Hugo Winners Volume Two page were merged into The Hugo Winners on 6 September 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Fair use rationale for Image:Asimov ed hugo avons127.JPG
[edit]Image:Asimov ed hugo avons127.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Merger proposal
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Seeing no opposition (or interest), merger approved. DOSGuy (talk) 16:56, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
I propose merging The Hugo Winners Volume Two into this article, and making this an article about the entire series. All five volumes are already listed, and a single book in the series (even the first book) doesn't seem notable enough to warrant an article. Making this article about the series would also be consistent with the article on The New Hugo Winners. The article is still small enough to easily support this change. DOSGuy (talk) 21:26, 29 August 2012 (UTC)