Talk:The House of the Spirits

Novels High‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Importance scale

I've changed it from Mid to High. It's the main novel by Allende, one of the most popular and most translated southamerican authors, and one of the main figures of the Magic Realism genre. Plus it was brought to the cinema in a movie starred Jeremy Irons, Meryl Streep, Winona Ryder, Glenn Close and Antonio Banderas.--Rataube 17:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I've set it back to "Mid." Admittedly, some other rather unimportant novels are featured at Category:High-importance_novel_articles. But The House of the Spirits is not a major novel, though it is a best-seling one. The fact that it has been made into a film is not really a distinguishing mark, whoever the actors may have been. (The film was terrible also, it's worth saying.) Isabel Allende is not a major author either, though again she is best-selling and as such also well-known.

Oh, and this article needs major improvement. At present it's little more than an extended plot summary. It says next to nothing about the book. If others feel it's important, I'd suggest it's up to them to explain why, beyond the fact it happens to have sold a lot of copies. What is original or interesting about it? --Jbmurray 09:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For these same reasons I've also downgraded it to "Start" category. --Jbmurray 09:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot/characters

Is it necessary to have analyses of the characters in this novel? Should we try to work it into a plot summary of the book instead? The summary reads like an overview of the book and its themes, and the actualy summary is hidden in the character list now. I'll work around this... Hurrah 05:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please transfer to previous version

My Browser crashed and it didn't upload the text from when I edited this page. Sorry about that. It was a mistake. can someone please asap change it and do not block me as i didn't mean for it to be happen.

--124.177.229.59 06:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

deleting "important novel"

(I added this subhead and brought the discussion to the bottom of the page. --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 01:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

This is a very important novel! It's even taught in English classes in American high schools. Would you delete the page for Catcher in the Rye outright just because the article sucked? --71.236.187.250 00:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. Surely for important pages, it's even more essential that the article about them doesn't suck! If this page doesn't improve, it fully deserves to go. Then perhaps later someone can start again with a better effort that actually follows Wikipedia guidelines. --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 01:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jbmurray, this seems more like an impulsive delete to me. At the very least, the article should be kept as a stub, but not deleted. The book is significant in many school curricula and has been a a significant contribution to Latin American literature. In any case, I will be reworking this article to revoke the deletion status. Soggybread 21:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing impulsive about the delete suggestion. I'd be delighted if you (or anyone else) were to upgrade the article in line with Wikipedia guidelines and with what one would expect of an encyclopedia. For a model article, you could do worse than look for instance at The Well of Loneliness. --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 21:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At the very least, five seconds deleting the plot summary would have given you a perfectly good stub, much better than deleting the whole thing.--Prosfilaes 20:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The PROD stirred Soggybread to work significantly on improving the article, which seems a better result altogether. --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 00:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think threatening volunteers with the deletion of their work is appropriate; they aren't here to work at your beck and call.--Prosfilaes 08:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you name the volunteers who were threatened?! --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 10:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can't you just look at the article history and see which volunteers you threatened to delete the work of?--Prosfilaes 14:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Houseofthesprirts.jpg

Image:Houseofthesprirts.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Houseofspirits.jpg

Image:Houseofspirits.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spoiler

On the article header, it says:

"The story is told mainly from the perspective of two protagonists (Esteban and Alba)"

The fact that it is Alba who is telling the story is deliberately concealed by the author until late in the book, which is why I think this information is a spoiler, and therefore shouldn't appear so soon (or at all) in the article.

200.140.82.71 (talk) 03:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a novel review where spoilers aren't permitted. This is an online free Encyclopedia. And an encyclopedia is to gather knowledge for everyone to read it. 189.173.139.13 (talk) 20:22, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 8 quotation

The article claims to include a direct quotation from this web page, but it's actually only a paraphrase. Or, perhaps, the web page has changed since the text was copied. -- John of Reading (talk) 09:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The House of the Spirits/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

* This article is at present little more than an extended plot summary.

Last edited at 09:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The House of the Spirits. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:31, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Disrupting the Status Quo- Social Justice in Technical and Professional Com

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 2 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kmathews1009 (article contribs).