Jump to content

Talk:The Head and the Hair

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Head and the Hair has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe Head and the Hair is part of the 30 Rock season 1 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 23, 2010Good article nomineeListed
May 8, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Head and the Hair (30 Rock)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Staxringold talkcontribs 20:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Couple things:
  • The infobox image caption needs fixing to make it clear for an outsider who is Liz and who is Jenna. I would say "Liz and 'The Head' (left) with Jenna and 'The Hair' (right)"
  • The lead summary has a little bit too flowery language, in my opinion. "one a cerebral nerd... and the other a gorgeous hunk" could be written more encyclopedically.
    • "A nerd and handsome man"?
  • "Things end abruptly, when" No comma needed.
    • Removed.
  • Really the whole second part of the Liz/Hair plot section needs some reworking. "Liz tries to go home as she is feeling freaked out" for example tells you nothing about why she was feeling freaked out, not to mention it's not particularly encyclopedically written.
  • "due to a publisher the next day, but he " No comma needed
    • Removed.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • As with the other review, why no cultural references section? For example, the article currently makes no mention of the tons of jokes with Brian Williams. Particularly notable since Williams returns multiple times in the series. The fake number Tracy gives out at clubs is William's #, and he runs into the MSNBC studio (where Jack's new lady from this season works) and yells "NIGHTLY NEWS RULES!". Plus a reference to Little People, Big World (or some other "show about midgets"). And that's just from about 1 minute of the episode.
  • Also there has to be more info on Radioman's cameo out there for the production section.
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  2. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  3. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  4. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Head and the Hair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]