This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
The Great Monkey Trial is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JonGreenberger. Peer reviewers: Philibenl, Alexhummels.
I've revamped the page. I've changed the lead to be more concise, and indicative of the book's significance, and expanded parts of the original lead into their own sections, with proper citation. Additionally, I've added to the reception section to better reflect the critical sentiment, with some emphasis given to the thoughts of one of the scientists who testified in the actual trial. Feel free to change any errors that may have been made, or let me know if I've changed some aspect of this article for the worse. JonGreenberger (talk) 19:17, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed the order of punctuation and quotation marks in this article. I have seen similar edits cause much debate in the past, but I have based my changes on the guidelines laid out in Wikipedia's manual of style. – eJames (talk) – 22:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]