Talk:The Goyim Know

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles

Jewish history

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To redirect for overlap; no unique referenced content to merge. Klbrain (talk) 10:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging this article into Goy. I think the content in this article can easily be explained in the context of Goy, and a merge would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Goy. The argument is one of context (one of the given reasons for Wikipedia page mergers - see https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Merging ). The existing Goy article provides a clear account both of the meaning and context to the use of Goy in English and wider coverage on the term's use in antisemitism.Atrapalhado (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea to me.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 18:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Since the Goy article already addresses this topic in its "In antisemitism" section, and uses two of the same references, I see no need to merge any content. The merge would be simply to make this a redirect. WriterArtistDC (talk) 16:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This, so much this Formerlychucks (talk) 22:12, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.