Jump to content

Talk:The Good Samaritan (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 20:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    All images have appropriate licenses.
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


Comments
  • Any idea how many episodes there were in the "pod"? checkY
  • What are "character beats"? checkY
  • The information in the first sentence of the lead is not in the article. The result is that it is unsourced. checkY
  • There is no comma after "Enforcement"
Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have fixed up 4 and noted 1 in the lead, but the article already had the number of episodes in it and I can't find mention of the term "character beats" so I am assuming that those were just copied over from the last review by accident. I have started a discussion at your talk page about 3. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]