Talk:The Good Huswifes Jewell

The Good Huswifes Jewell has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 6, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Good Huswifes Jewell/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will get to this in a day or two. Superb one, as always! Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 13:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking this on! Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In Lead:
- Would be good to add a word about who Dawson is although you link him.

Added a gloss. Chiswick Chap (talk)

In Context:
- with for example locally-grown Should this not use commas like "with, for example, locally-grown" ?

Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Just curious, does "Medieval" mean the same as "Middle Ages" here? Can we use any one term?

It's basically the only available adjective for "of the Middle Ages". Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In Overview:
- In the first few lines, it should be clear that "he" refers to the author.

Said "Dawson". Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In Approach:
- Is the term "goal" is linked to not a bit too technical for our purpose?

Removed link. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- The "hearbes" link in the quote is a duplicate.

Removed link. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In Reception:
- Elizabethan is linked twice, and both are duplinks.

Removed links. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Who is Opaskar?

Glossed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Link violet a bit earlier, at first mention.

Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That should be it. An interesting read, would make a great GA. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 09:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, ready for promotion! Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 15:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rosewater!

If rosewater is that unfamiliar today, how come I can buy it by the bottle in supermarkets and even corner shops? Stub Mandrel (talk) 15:36, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I changed this to "ingredients that are uncommon in modern cooking". They are familiar and not difficult to find at shops but they are not commonly used. Modern cookbooks only infrequently include a recipe with rosewater but some Middle Eastern cookbooks still use it. Spudlace (talk) 06:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]