Talk:The George Hotel, Crawley/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 14:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
I shall review. ⇒TAP 14:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- Initial Comments
- The lead is meant to summarise the article, per MOS:LEADCITE and MOS:LEAD. In the article I see no reference of "Ramada Crawley Gatwick". I did not see the "or earlier" or "16th century" bit in the article body. Per that, include in body. I don't mind "Crawley's most celebrated building", as it is a quote.
Mentioned Ramada Crawley Gatwick in the facilities section. Will expand lead later.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- History
- "At the time of the Domesday survey in 1086, no manor or village of Crawley existed,[5] but the thickly forested area was gradually being cleared and settled" — please reword this, so the "no manor or village of Crawley" is easier to read.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail: