Talk:The Gambia at the 2016 Summer Olympics
The Gambia at the 2016 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 14, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Gambia at the 2016 Summer Olympics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Gambia at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 08:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
- @Kees08: The above issues raised have now been rectified. With regards to the qualifying point, it explains how the Olympic team was able to select their athletes for the games and I believe it should remain in the article. MWright96 (talk) 09:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- GA-Class Olympics articles
- Low-importance Olympics articles
- WikiProject Olympics articles
- GA-Class Africa articles
- Low-importance Africa articles
- GA-Class Gambia articles
- Low-importance Gambia articles
- WikiProject Gambia articles
- Articles created or improved during the WikiProject Africa 10,000 Challenge
- WikiProject Africa articles