Talk:The Funeral Pyre
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Funeral Pyre article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).
Both The Nature of Betrayal and Wounds (Album) were released by Prosthetic Records, a major label, therefore proving notability. EOA3928 (talk) 01:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Prosthetic is not a major label, it's an indie. One of the more important indies? I don't know about that. TheJazzDalek (talk) 02:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- List of record labels: I-Q
- "This is a list of notable record labels, starting with I-Q." Stated at the top of the page, proving that both the label and band are notable enough to be here. Give them a look, there's quite a few bands for an 11 year old record company. EOA3928 (talk) 02:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- You misunderstand me. I didn't say Prosthetic didn't pass Wikipedia standards of notability. I said I wasn't sure that they were "one of the more important indies" mentioned in WP:MUSIC. TheJazzDalek (talk) 03:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ya kinda have to think about it like, "if it's here on Wikipedia and hasn't been deleted yet, it's probably important." Generally, I figure if it's on Wiki and it hasn't been eliminated, it's probably got some notability and importance, because a lot of people tend to delete pages that they deem not important, yet there's a Wikipedia page about breadcrumbs. I'm not trying to come off as a jerk; I'm just trying to save these pages. It meets the guidelines, so I figure it shouldn't be a problem, ya know? On another note, one of the more famous metal bands of this age, All That Remains, is on this label, as well as band Lamb of God was once with this label. Both of these bands are extremely notable, and on this label, so I assume, most bands that have enough information, on such a label shouldn't be a problem. EOA3928 (talk) 03:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to drop it but first I'll try one last time to explain: being notable by Wikipedia standards is not an endorsement of importance. Something can meet the WP inclusion criteria without being exceptionally important. TheJazzDalek (talk) 03:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Like breadcrumbs? Just saying..... I understand what you're saying, though. I've worked hard at keeping this page as notable and worthwhile, and this only proves that I should do better. Still, I appreciate that you even brought this up. It'll ensure that I keep this page as noteworthy as possible. EOA3928 (talk) 03:31, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to drop it but first I'll try one last time to explain: being notable by Wikipedia standards is not an endorsement of importance. Something can meet the WP inclusion criteria without being exceptionally important. TheJazzDalek (talk) 03:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ya kinda have to think about it like, "if it's here on Wikipedia and hasn't been deleted yet, it's probably important." Generally, I figure if it's on Wiki and it hasn't been eliminated, it's probably got some notability and importance, because a lot of people tend to delete pages that they deem not important, yet there's a Wikipedia page about breadcrumbs. I'm not trying to come off as a jerk; I'm just trying to save these pages. It meets the guidelines, so I figure it shouldn't be a problem, ya know? On another note, one of the more famous metal bands of this age, All That Remains, is on this label, as well as band Lamb of God was once with this label. Both of these bands are extremely notable, and on this label, so I assume, most bands that have enough information, on such a label shouldn't be a problem. EOA3928 (talk) 03:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- You misunderstand me. I didn't say Prosthetic didn't pass Wikipedia standards of notability. I said I wasn't sure that they were "one of the more important indies" mentioned in WP:MUSIC. TheJazzDalek (talk) 03:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)