Talk:The Free Press (online newsletter)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Free Press (online newsletter) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
On 14 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from The Free Press (media company) to The Free Press (online newsletter). The result of the discussion was moved. |
August 2023: Work in Progress
[edit]I have recreated this article by greatly expanding an old version of The Free Press (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), but have not yet spent the time to find independent sources for many of the facts I added. If anyone can help, please, please do so.
BTW, creating this article takes care of a redlink in the Free Press disambiguation page.
Full disclosure: I am a subscriber to this publication. Cheers, CWC 10:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
History subsection
[edit]Noting that the latter half of the History section contained similar information about things the FP has published, I thought a subsection would make navigation easier. I'm not sure whether "Coverage", is the most suitable term for the section name, but I added the section anyway.– St.nerol (talk) 16:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]There has been a notability-tag on the page for some time now. Here's a WSJ piece that might be helpful to establish notability: [1]. —St.Nerol (talk, contribs) 21:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Good find. Thanks!
- It would be useful to have at least one more "reliable secondary source" talking about The Free Press. I found an item in The Australian of 4-Mar-2023 titled "How Bari Weiss fought for her own free press", but it's behind a paywall. Would these two articles convincingly demonstrate Notability? What do other editors think? Cheers, CWC 10:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- And now Marquardtika, an experienced user, has removed the notability tag with the comment "the sources here definitely establish WP:GNG". I'm fine with that. CWC 10:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Debate re Sexual Revolution
[edit]We probably should mention the public debate that TFP ran in Los Angeles last September. They sold all 1600 seats in the theater. Possible citations:
- https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2023-09-14/bari-weiss-the-free-press-debate-grimes-louise-perry-anna-khachiyan-sarah-haider
- https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/09/scenes-from-the-end-of-the-sexual-revolution.html
- https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/10/bari-weiss-free-press-event
What do other editors think? Cheers, CWC 10:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Free Press (organization) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
"Dead link" in footnote "[16]"
[edit](At least, "as of" the "Latest revision as of 00:23, 20 August 2024" version of this article), the link from footnote "[16]" points to the URL https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/01/american-miseducation-teaching-hate-on-campus.php ... which (when I tried it) says
NOT FOUND
Apologies, but the page you requested could not be found. Perhaps searching will help.
However, even when I tried using the "search" features of that web site [see the "S.R.P." ('search results page') https://www.powerlineblog.com/?s=American+Miseducation&x=12&y=11 e.g.] I was not able to figure out the "new" URL -- if any -- for the web page that [probably] used to exist, at the "old" URL -- (ending with 'dot' php) -- that is mentioned above.
I did find [e.g.] https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/01/american-miseducation.php but that seems to be by a different author.
I also found
- https://www.thefp.com/p/watch-american-miseducation-free-press-doc
This one has (after an explanation about Age-restricted content), a link to a Youtube video, which can be seen [on Youtube, apparently] at - U.S. Colleges Teaching Hate: American Miseducation (Documentary)
I did notice (with the help of the "Wayback machine" web site), that an archived "copy" of that web page that seems to have been deleted or "moved" to a new internet address ... could be found at [this "archive-" URL]:
So the best solution would probably be: to use "| url-status = dead", and to mention that "web.archive.org" [= the "Wayback machine"] URL as the value of the "| archive-url = [...]" field. (right?)
Any comments? Mike Schwartz (talk) 06:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)