Talk:The Firemen's Ball

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Czech Republic Low‑importance

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unsourced statements

All unsourced statements are from an interview with Milos Forman in the Criterion Collection dvd release of the film, also quoted in the essay by J. Hoberman on the criterion site.

No actors?

I haven't seen the film, but I vaguely remember some documentary shots from audition for it, contrasting pathetic amateur singers with a professional one (perhaps Hana Hegerova) - certainly the firemen played themselves, but I think there were some professional actors as well. 89.102.137.191 16:22, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Panenko.jpg

Image:Panenko.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:The Fireman's Ball (1974 film) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:47, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Was the film banned?

An unsourced claim in this article stated that the film was not in fact banned in Czechoslovakia. I looked into the matter and tried to find any sources to support that claim, and found none. I found many which stated that the film was initially shown in the country until the Soviet crackdown and invasion in 1968, after which it was banned "forever" and Forman was forced to leave the country. That seems to be the standard story in the English language literature, and I have edited the article to reflect that. If anyone has any more insight into the question, we can consider amending the article. Toadchavay (talk) 07:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ponti

it should be made clear that ponti pulled his financing b/c he found the film too short. i am guessing he might have implied "silly" or "amateurish" as well, tho i cannot find anything beyond "short" just yet. either way, article right now makes it sound like he found content OFFENSIVE like the czech authorities. i find no evidence this was at all the case.

should be made clear he objected solely(?) due to its length. 2601:19C:527F:A660:DC8A:84D8:E045:9F2C (talk) 09:55, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]