Talk:The Filthy Critic

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Is there someone who could clean up this page? I am not a very good writer and I would really like to see someone do The Filthy Critic some justice.

---

ok, someone keeps upping the ante for statistical data. the challenge is on! ;-)

---

Also, we could use some more quotes from his reviews to help emphasize the synopsis and make it more NPOV. I'm new to the 'pedia, but I recall reading that simply describing someone w/o quotes or statements is discouraged.

Added a couple of quotes. I'm also pretty new and uneducated at this editing thing, so please chime in if you disagree with the presentation. I'd also like to see a good page for Filthy. I love his reviews. Rufus Sarsaparilla 19:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contents of this page

Mark Sweep: The last post to this page was from May 2006. Gershwinrb's concerns seem to have been addressed. The other comments have been lingering for some time. Do you really think we need to keep these old bits around? Would you have preferred an archived page, for just these few random comments? Scott Carpenter 02:57, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Should there really be lines that read "very often astutely points out", "He is very succinct with his criticism", et al... This article does not seem very objective because of commentary like that. Gershwinrb 05:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Filthy is back with a new blog, and a new persona

That was it. I came here looking for answers but found nothing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.237.54 (talk) 06:14, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]