Talk:The Dundies

The Dundies has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

The Dundies is part of the The Office (American season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 27, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
January 11, 2013	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage / The Office Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by The Office task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dunder Mifflin

I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 19:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TheOffice(US)2-01.jpg

Image:TheOffice(US)2-01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Dundies/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. I've placed the GA nomination on hold. Here is my initial review:

~~The first picture's fair use rationale is substandard. I find it easier to use {{Non-free use rationale}}.~~ RedThunder 23:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~The last sentence of the lead implies that Pam gets drunk before getting in an argument, which is not the case.~~ RedThunder 23:46, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~I'm not sure that I'd describe Pam's speech as emotional. Belligerent is probably a better word.~~ RedThunder 23:35, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The review that is in box quotes is more about comparing the US series to the UK series. Instead of the box quote, how about summarizing with Seb Patrick of Noise to Signal, while comparing the US Office favorably to the UK version, writes...? RedThunder 23:38, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why does the article only describe the Nielsen ratings for the 18-49 demographic?
It is the only one available that the press release blurb displayed, and the only one that NBC uses for press releases. RedThunder 23:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 23:56, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Refs 2 and 3 are IMDB, which is not a reliable source.~~ RedThunder 23:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 6 is to Office Tally, which is a fan site and not a reliable source. The link provided for Office Tally itself links to a bunch of press releases detailing ratings for The Office. Just find the right press release and link to it. RedThunder 23:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! Ice Cold Beer (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that point 4 has been adequately addressed. What I want is for the part of review pertaining to this episode to be paraphrased (and trimmed down). I'm sorry if I was unclear. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 00:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done RedThunder 00:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was unclear, but I wanted it significantly trimmed. I took care of it myself. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 00:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just did my final read through of the article, and I am pleased with what I see. I'm listing it. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 00:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Dundies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]