Talk:The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Untitled

This page is taken full-cloth from [1], and appears to have originated from [2], which seems to be somehow connected to Project Gutenberg. What is to be done? NatusRoma 19:14, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 13:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Set the importance as low, since it is only obscurely connected with Judaism. Rich Farmbrough, 01:25, 23 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Removed an absurdity

The suggestion that Joly borrowed from the 'real' protocols is based on a mention of this by Norman Cohn, who however dismissed it as absurd. This makes it invalid, unsourced, so I removed it.

(By analogy, if a book said "those who suggest Joe Soap murdered his wife talk obvious nonsense", you could not use it as a source for a suggestion that Joe Soap actually did murder his wife.) --GwydionM (talk) 09:50, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 January 2025

It has been proposed in this section that The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu be renamed and moved to Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu → Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu – I am requesting a correction to the title. This book's original title in French is "Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu". There is no article at the beginning of the title; it is not called "Le Dialogue...". Therefore, a more appropriate translation of the title into English would be "Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu", without "The". JohnMizuki (talk) 23:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. While the nomination presents an intuitive argument, the English-language translation has been published as "The Dialogue...", therefore the main title header of English Wikipedia's entry represents the English-language published title of the French text. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. We'd not list All Quiet on the Western Front as Nothing New in the West, which is an accurate translation of the original German title.--GwydionM (talk) 09:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]