Talk:The Daltons (Lucky Luke)

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Westerns Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

picture

We don't have a single picture of the Daltons? Come on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.64.221.238 (talk) 21:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Lucky Luke canon is a valid source for references

The Lucky Luke canon is a valid source for references, which this article is tagged as clearly needing. Valid sources about Morris and Goscinny could be utilized to reference the origin of the Dalton cousins, but the canon itself is a valuable source that cannot be dismissed out of hand. To do so is tantamount to page vandalism.TH1980 (talk) 03:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, random accusations of vandalism are not a good way to start a discussion. Secondly, you misunderstand what the tag means: it asks for more sources - that is not fixed by retelling several anecdotes from one of the books in the series. Mezigue (talk) 17:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the "vandalism" comment, but my intention is to source this page starting with pertinent references to books in the canon, using select anecdotes to amplify what is already presented.TH1980 (talk) 04:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"To each on their own"?

A Lucky Luke story cointaining The Daltons named "To each on their own" is mentioned severeal times in the article. However, I couldn't find anything about such a story. Does it even exist? Is the name cited correctly? --JakobvS (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The actual title appears to be Cavalier Seul. No idea where this English title comes from. I have removed this obsessive retelling of this particular book twice but, well see discussion just above. Mezigue (talk) 15:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]