Talk:The Cutie Re-Mark

Animation: American / Canadian / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Canadian animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

My Little Pony Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject My Little Pony, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of My Little Pony related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.My Little PonyWikipedia:WikiProject My Little PonyTemplate:WikiProject My Little PonyMy Little Pony
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Verifiability?

So we finally have an article for the season 5 finale. But from the looks of things, it doesn't seem to have that much outside coverage apart from a few articles and a single review, making it very scarce for anything other than a plot summary. It's not that much more coverage than every other episode we haven't made an article for, so I must question whether this article meets Wikipedia's guidelines for verifiability. If it's because it's "plot relevant" to the series as a whole, we've already discussed that "game changers" like "Crusaders of the Lost Mark" shouldn't get articles without significant second-party coverage. And while it was mentioned that this kind of coverage usually falls on season premieres and finales, as you can see, we don't have an article for the season 4 premiere "Princess Twilight Sparkle". So I propose we make a notice of the article's lack of verifiability, if not its deletion. User:SubZeroSilver (talk) 13:49, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I support redirecting this to the episode list. There is no reason for this episode to have its own article. Gial Ackbar (talk) 03:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if there are no objections, I'll make the redirect. User:SubZeroSilver (talk) 03:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]