Jump to content

Talk:The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I would strongly suggest not to delete the article

[edit]

Using google helps to see at a glance why of course the article is a relevant lemma [1] And as far as I'm informed Martin H. Glynn was the first one to use the noun holocaust with reference to jews.


Aborvegyro 11:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's an false-positive as you're getting 300,000 hits searching on any combination of the words, not on the title. Searching on "The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop" brings up a grand total of 69 hits, mostly from message boardsiridescent (talk to me!) 11:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No it's not a false positive. Have a look inside. For sample here or here. Aborvegyro 11:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not saying there are no ghits - I'm saying there are 69, of which that's one, and not 300,000+. As I say, if you can provide references to show this paper is important I'll withdraw the nomination, but I certainly can't find them - not a single major news organisation or academic source using the term, and by page two of the search we're already up to "Playstation 3 forum" - but as I say, the sources may not be online for something this old. Incidentally, the OED dates the first recorded use of "holocaust" in its modern sense ("the massacre of a large number of people, particularly by the use of fire") to 1671, and it was already in common usage by the mid 19th century (see Names of the Holocaustiridescent (talk to me!) 12:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See above Aborvegyro 13:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hint: on nizkor they discuss the article Glynn worte

[edit]

here you go Aborvegyro