Talk:The Circle (British TV series) series 3

Television: British / Reality Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Reality television task force.

Citations Removal

I added citations for The blockings as the article was noted as needing additional citations for verification but a user, Wii35, has removed all of them. I would like to know the reason for this as I felt my contributions were helpful and shouldn’t have been reverted without the user reverting them even giving a reason. It seemed other editors were fine or happy with my edits. JamesVilla44 (talk) 22:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to @JamesVilla44: I agree with adding more references. In particular, the blockings do not usually get references, see the other seasons, but more references can never hurt in my opinion, as long as they are good sources. Chase | ^talk 22:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Episode 9 ratings

Should we put in the final votes for 'The Blocker'. Thoughts? MSalmon (talk) 22:00, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to @Msalmon: I have actually been thinking about doing this, but could not figure out how to do it in a nice way. If you would like, come up with something and submit it here and then we can discuss it? Chase | ^talk 23:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe just include who voted who in the notes for that round? It's an elimination table, and they did already rate in that round anyway. Just thinking adding that extra column could make it more confusing. ThisIsDanny (talk) 06:59, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean adding an extra column just replace 'Not published' with the Blocker votes MSalmon (talk) 09:38, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst it would be a good idea, I feel it would just end up looking cluttered and messy. - XxLuckyCxX (talk) 14:22, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to @Msalmon: I agree that it should be included in the table, if we can add it without it looking messy. This is similar to how we added the votes for the blocking between tally and yolanda. Chase | ^talk 22:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at this http://www.circlespy.co.uk/series-3/ratings/by-player they have added it in (I know it is a fan site) MSalmon (talk) 10:47, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the votes for Episode 4 because they were voting for either Blue or Orange Tally MSalmon (talk) 15:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment towards @Wii35: If you are going to revert the voting for influencer, can you state your opinion here as well and talk about it? Otherwise your opinion will not be heard and you might not think it is relevant, but there are editors that think it is. Chase | ^talk 21:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with their reasons behind reverting back to "Not published" ThisIsDanny (talk) 21:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How come we are using their real names instead of what they are referred to on the show (i.e. Gemma, Felix etc) MSalmon (talk)

When they're credited on the show they use both names. ThisIsDanny (talk) 21:35, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the Episode 4 column the votes show Yolanda and Tally but they were known as Orange Tally and Blue Tally. MSalmon (talk) 21:37, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]