Talk:The Campaign for North Africa

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Campaign for North Africa article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Board and table games Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	World War II task force

It is requested that an image or photograph of The Campaign for North Africa be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Decision

I've looked at Decision Games' website, and it's not on the list which extends into 2009! --Surgeonsmate 04:53, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't on the pledge page, but it is on the future games page. As of now it's #41 on the numbered list. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, Andrew! Some mouthwatering games there. Where were they thirty years ago? --Surgeonsmate 03:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly playable ...

I have played this game (once), although not the full game, just up to the fall of Tobruk

We had two teams of three, although one team had five people playing in rotation

I would guess that we played 4 hours, twice a week, plus occasional 12-hour Sundays every term for two years, so that would come to about 800 hours (!)

The paperwork required could very easily be handled by computer now, and this would be a very playable PC game, similar in scale to Civilization 83.105.70.75 (talk) 16:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spike

This article appeared in the list of top read articles yesterday at number #41 with 72,845 readers – more than Billie Eilish, Prince Harry and Sex! I'm not sure why but it might be a spinoff from Morocco at the FIFA World Cup. Others who might know more include: @Airborne84, BOZ, GreenC, Guinness323, and Starblind:... Andrew🐉(talk) 12:36, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting! I can only wonder why. BOZ (talk) 13:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The pages that link here don't seem to provide any help. I have no good explanation right now. Airborne84 (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elsewhere Sam Walton suggests that it's Reddit's TIL, which tends to be a big driver of traffic. Good intelligence! Andrew🐉(talk) 20:07, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seem's pretty easy

Could probably complete in a single night with some buddies if you give us some beers ThyOfThee (talk) 03:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Youtuber mention

Arousing discussion about the relevance of the youtuber mentioned in popular culture. It contributes very little to the article and is not of much relevance to the topic itself - further more upon investigation the claim seems dubious, as CNA is rarely mentioned in the youtuber's videos. I believe it thus suitable for removal. If a substantial amount of people agree then it should go forth. Arthritic Walrus (talk) 00:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it's been edited out. Right choice IMO. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 06:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]