Talk:The Calcutta Quran Petition

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

No consensus, 24 January 2021, see discussion.
no consensus, 30 July 2011 (UTC), see discussion.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

India: Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Two questions

Is this book merely a collection of events or does it have a unifying theme?
This is a book about banning. We this book itself actually banned? -- 67.127.56.197 07:01, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions

As explained here the following was deleted in the article by Hornplease (talk · contribs) but no reason was put on the talkpage. Why was it deleted, and how could it be improved.. http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=The_Calcutta_Quran_Petition&diff=prev&oldid=126091322 Further reading

Elst, Koenraad, Ayodhya and After: Issues Before Hindu Society (1991)
Freedom of expression - Secular Theocracy Versus Liberal Democracy (1998, edited by Sita Ram Goel)

External links

Full Online book The Calcutta Quran Petition
Negationism in India
Book banning
The Case of Inder Sain Sharma About the "poster"
The story of the Quran petition
Book review by N.S. Rajaram
Review by D. Kabir Das

i dont' understand why the links were removedLibrorum Prohibitorum (talk) 03:31, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, I have restored the material.--CltFn (talk) 07:15, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CalcutaQuranPetition.jpg

Image:CalcutaQuranPetition.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on The Calcutta Quran Petition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subject

What is this article about? The book or the petition? TrangaBellam (talk) 16:27, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that The Times of India archives are digitized by Proquest. This probably contains some reporting about the subject — (The Times of India published three articles by Dr. Rafiq Zakaria in praise of the Quran).
The Telegraph of Calcutta (May 9, 10, 14, 18), The Statesman (May 9, 13, 14), and Navabharat Times (May 22) are the newspaper sources, referred to in Goel's book. The span extends to roughly a fortnight and WP:NOTNEWS likely applies.
Hmm, the incident appears to have some deservedly-negative coverage in scholarly journals but Goel's book does not appear to have interested any scholar:

"Right Stand, Wrong Reasons". Economic and Political Weekly. 20 (19): 814–814. 11 May 1985. ISSN 0012-9976.
Mody, Nawaz B. (1987). "The Press in India: The Shah Bano Judgment and Its Aftermath". Asian Survey. 27 (8): 945. doi:10.2307/2644865. ISSN 0004-4687. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:48, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Making this an article about the case. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:59, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]