Talk:The Bryce Report

Military history: Historiography / British / European / German / World War I

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military historiography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Untitled

Once again, critics to the commission are "few" and the response to the critics are "vast". Wikipedia is truly suffering a grave problem to balance out what new folks are writing with old writers. Basically wikipedia is tending to see reliable sources on "new" writers. Most needed in this article is to balance the critics to the commission with the response topic, since, as it is now, breaks any neutrality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.119.210.47 (talk) 22:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the work by a. ponsonby is NOT a novel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.129.149.149 (talk) 12:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Committee on Alleged German Outrages

This page and the above-mentioned describe the same subject. Both have useful information so propose merging this into the other, as "Committee on Alleged German Outrages" is the correct name for the report, but can indicate in page that it is known as The Bryce Commission. Johnhousefriday (talk) 05:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but the result needs some work I think. Salmanazar (talk) 10:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]