This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
Dear MikeAllen: I honestly didn't know it was a bad thing to discuss chapter markings/"title cards", which are plainly on the screen, and not debatable, unlike, say, characters' inner motivation. Can you please point out chapter and verse which prevents discussion of title cards? Too, why didn't you eliminate my title-card notes long ago, instead of leaving it up a long time? (And other editors have largely tolerated it, too, e.g., someone got rid of "Crucifixion", but basically left the rest) Thanks, as always. John315 (talk) 21:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not about how long it's been there. I don't read this article daily. I just noticed it, and I removed it because it's not needed for readers to understand the basic plot points. MOS:FILMPLOT: "The plot summary is an overview of the main events, so avoid minutiae like dialogue, scene-by-scene breakdowns, individual jokes, and technical detail". Can you explain why you think it's needed for the understanding of the plot? Wikipedia is not a substitute for the original. MikeAllen21:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It helps by giving the basic organization of the film, into three "Books". The filmmaker did it for a reason. (It's the "biblical", or call it "pseudo-biblical"?, style of the film.) And this is in your second linked article: "Plot summaries should be written from the real world perspective by referring to specific works or parts of works ("In the first book", "In Act II") or describing things from the author or creator's perspective ("The author introduces", "The story describes")." So, maybe it's o.k. for me to mention the three "Books" of the movie? John315 (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This may be a bit obvious, but this film lacks a TriStar logo with a byline, nor is there any mention of Sony anywhere. I was surprised that Sony Pictures Releasing, who has Distributed Sony Pictures movies since 1993-ish, isn’t even involved. Is this a one-off with Tristar? What’s going on? BiggieSMLZ (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
