Talk:The Boat Races 2015

The Boat Races 2015 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 11, 2021.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 16, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed
May 24, 2015	Peer review	Reviewed
August 29, 2015	Featured article candidate	Promoted
A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on April 11, 2015.
Current status: Featured article

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rowing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rowing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rowing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RowingWikipedia:WikiProject RowingTemplate:WikiProject Rowingrowing articles

To-do list:

Featured Articles:

Raise the rowing (sport) article to featured status.
1. Get article relisted to 'good article status'
2. Put through another round of peer review, see here
3. Nominate for featured status
Ditto for Henley Royal Regatta, The Boat Race , Steve Redgrave

Stubs: see here..

Tag {{Rowing-stub}} onto all rowing stub articles so we can keep track of them.
Expand stubs to at least start class.

Image requests: see here..
Article requests: see here..

Write bios for World Rowing champions (see the redlinks in the templates)

Document FISA database errors

River Thames (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Cambridge

This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles

University of Oxford Mid‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

While I doubt this will get too much traffic, I was hoping for some debate over the title of the article. This event will be the first time that the women's race will be on a equal footing and conducted on the Tideway, so my first instinct is to suggest this becomes "The Boat Races 2015" and I modify the lead accordingly. Any feelings anyone? The Rambling Man (talk) 14:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it. BOLD. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With the exception of a few articles for the BBC (e.g. here, here, here and here), the majority of the articles that I'm seeing are still referring to this race in the singular (e.g. The Telegraph, London Evening Standard, The Guardian and The Independent). A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 00:10, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the change. The primary source is referring to the races, plural. The BNY Mellon Boat Races Whizz40 (talk) 10:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well it's not of great consequence at this moment, there's a redirect taking our readers to this article should they opt for The Boat Race 2015, I think it's probably wise to allow time to pass before making any further comments. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Claire Balding

This article maybe of note? Cantab12 (talk) 23:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Order

Is there any reason, apart from being obviously alphabetical, that the woman sections precede the men's? -DePiep (talk) 22:03, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One has to go before the other. In terms of the race bit, the women's race took place before the men's so talking about it in that order would make sense. -- KTC (talk) 22:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures from the finish line

I've uploaded a variety of shots in case they are useful - Pointillist (talk) 14:02, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pix for The Boat Races 2015, Women's Boat Race, Constantine Louloudis, etc

Men's VIII finish
Oxford Men's VIII celebrating victory
Oxford Men's VIII after the finish
Close-up of Hakim & Louloudis
Oxford Women's VIII approaching the finish
Oxford Women's VIII crossing the finish
Oxford Women's VIII after the finish
Cambridge Women's VIII at the finish (1)
Cambridge Women's VIII at the finish (2)
Finish of the Reserves Race
Oxford Reserve VIII celebrating

Notability for Front Page News

I want to point out that annual inter-university boat races, even between two prestigious universities, is of little interest or relevance to the vast majority of Wikipedia users.

Why not mention large scale events that actually have an impact on the world such as the membership expansion of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank?

This boat race is a local event of local interest, having NO impact on history and NO impact on the lives of any who live on Earth (apart from the racers and support team - a few dozen people).

Perhaps Wikipedia should now place celebrity pregnancy stories on the front page? Perhaps the results of a local children's athletics carnival as well?

Total rubbish that should be immediately removed from the Front Page news.

27.32.45.152 (talk) 01:54, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input. Please discuss it in the appropriate location, which isn't here. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Boat Races 2015/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 22:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
A few quibbles.
"The Autumn reception" Per MOS:SEASON, "autumn" should not be capitalised.

Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"headstart" should "head start"

Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"fightback" should be "fight back"

"fightback" is okay in British English. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"p.m" should be "p.m." or "pm" per MOS:TIME (multiple times)

Made consistent to "p.m." The Rambling Man (talk) 07:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Rachel Quarrell, the former Oxford cox" Link the first use of cox to Coxswain (rowing)

Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated links: Boris Rankov, Molesey Boat Club (2), Goldie, stroke, Constantine Louloudis. Hammersmith Bridge, Barnes Bridge (2), out-rating, St Paul's School

Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
All the links are good, a benefit of getting the article reviewed quickly

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused (see summary style):
A fine, well-written account
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
All images appropriately tagged. A lot of good images by Pointillist and Katie Chan. Well done there!

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Pretty good overall.

Thanks for the review, much appreciated. I believe I've addressed your comments, but do let me know if there's anything else I can do. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images and Good article criteria

Perhaps Hawkeye7 was just being courteous about images? Having uploaded mine to Commons as PD or CC-by-SA of course I've no right to object to en.wikipedia editors assessing them in context, whether or not I participated in how they were used. Nevertheless I want to make it crystal clear that I take no part in enwiki's somewhat incestuous Good article (GA), In the News (ITN) and Did you know (DYK) how boring we are processes. Scoring points that way has never been my motivation for improving articles, I promise. - Pointillist (talk) 23:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Boat Races 2015. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:FRAC

A user has unilaterally gone against MOS and changed fractions from using {{frac}}. As this is an FA it needs to comply with MOS. There is no good reason for this to have happened so unless there's consensus against the MOS-compliant version, I'll restore it in due course. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 22:14, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]