Talk:The Boat Race 2009

The Boat Race 2009 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 15, 2014. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Boat Race 2009 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Rowing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rowing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rowing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RowingWikipedia:WikiProject RowingTemplate:WikiProject Rowingrowing

To-do list:

Featured Articles:

Raise the rowing (sport) article to featured status.
1. Get article relisted to 'good article status'
2. Put through another round of peer review, see here
3. Nominate for featured status
Ditto for Henley Royal Regatta, The Boat Race , Steve Redgrave

Stubs: see here..

Tag {{Rowing-stub}} onto all rowing stub articles so we can keep track of them.
Expand stubs to at least start class.

Image requests: see here..
Article requests: see here..

Write bios for World Rowing champions (see the redlinks in the templates)

Document FISA database errors

University of Cambridge

This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

River Thames (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of The Boat Race 2014 was copied or moved into The Boat Race 2009 with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Boat Race 2009/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Matty.007 (talk · contribs) 10:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this on as a relatively recent Boat Race. I doubt there is much to do (comparing with other GAs such as the 2014 edition), merely a few minor tweaks, forthcoming. Thanks, Mat ty.007 10:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In 'Background', mention The Championship Course?
- Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:15, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No DAB, refs and EL all link fine
- Cool. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:15, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The Daily Telegraph is in italics for the ref, but CBC isn't. Should it be?
- Telegraph is a work while CBC is a publisher. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:15, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Knew it was something like that, but I am not familiar with CBC. All well done so far. Thanks, Mat ty.007 11:21, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mention dark/light blue nicknames?
- Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:15, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can't find where Colin Smith won silver for Great Britain, while Ante Kušurin rowed for Croatia, New Zealander George Bridgewater won a bronze in the coxless pair, Sjoerd Hamburger rowed for The Netherlands and Alex Hearne for the United States is referenced in the source given
- Lazy on my behalf, refs now added. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can't find to Oxford's three in the ref (may be my mistake)
- In the crew listings, a Blue is indicated with an asterisk, I count three for Oxford and five for Cambridge. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:29, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Umpire Rankov: perhaps link to Boris Rankov?
- Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:27, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
two-thirds of a length up: up to ahead?
- Replace up with ahead. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mention whom the Chiswick Eyot clash was between (in [1])
- Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oxford won the Women's Boat Race, hosted at Henley on 22 March 2014: lengths?
- Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:27, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's all I have issue with. Thanks, Mat ty.007 10:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks so much for the review. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's all:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Please can the lead be expanded a bit so it isn't two one sentence paragraphs? Then good
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Just lead expansion a little please. Thanks, Mat ty.007 12:21, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, I think. Thanks again. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, all looks good, thanks for the prompt responses. Passing now. Best, Mat ty.007 18:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Boat Race 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140607011127/http://www.ox.ac.uk/media/news_stories/2009/090330.html to http://www.ox.ac.uk/media/news_stories/2009/090330.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]