Talk:The Boat Race 1987

The Boat Race 1987 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 17, 2014. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Boat Race 1987 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Rowing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rowing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rowing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RowingWikipedia:WikiProject RowingTemplate:WikiProject Rowingrowing articles

To-do list:

Featured Articles:

Raise the rowing (sport) article to featured status.
1. Get article relisted to 'good article status'
2. Put through another round of peer review, see here
3. Nominate for featured status
Ditto for Henley Royal Regatta, The Boat Race , Steve Redgrave

Stubs: see here..

Tag {{Rowing-stub}} onto all rowing stub articles so we can keep track of them.
Expand stubs to at least start class.

Image requests: see here..
Article requests: see here..

Write bios for World Rowing champions (see the redlinks in the templates)

Document FISA database errors

University of Cambridge

This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

River Thames (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources

Comments

I've made a few tweaks here and there: feel free to tweak further/revert, etc. A nicely put together article (of course!) which is a dead cert for GA and has enough to it for a stab at FA, I feel. A few minor comments below, by way of an informal PR:

Lead

This is a little thin: is there any way we can enlarge it slightly? The mention of the new sponsor may be something to think of?
I've had a pop at it. If I think of anything else I'll certainly expand it further. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History

"Cambridge went into the race as reigning champions, having won the 1986 race by seven lengths,[5] with Cambridge leading overall": could do with a tweak here, bit of a Cambs/Cambs duplication
Indeed, tweaked. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"University of Oxford and the University of Cambridge". How about saying "the universities of Oxford and Cambridge to avoid the repetition of "University of"? Cassianto ^talk 09:26, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"The race was sponsored by Beefeater Gin for the first time". Do we know when? If so, we could word it like this: "The race was sponsored for the first time in **** by Beefeater Gin". Cassianto ^talk 09:26, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mutiny

I see people have denied it was a mutiny: is this still the COMMONNAME for the events? (if it is, then all is good with the term)
I think it's okay, per COMMONNAME as you suggest. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Following defeat in the previous year's race..." -- Helpful to know what year we are talking about. I appreciate it is the name if the article, but one is liable to get confused seeing as we do mention other years in the previous section. Cassianto ^talk 09:26, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"However": always a bugbear for some at FAC, especially at the start of a sentence. I think you can probably lose it here, just saying "In a fitness test..."
Excised. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Race

"indavertantly resulted in avoiding racing in a lightning storm": I think this could be phrased a little more elegantly, but my brain is struggling too much at the moment to come up with something useful!
Tried.... The Rambling Man (talk) 09:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy

"a film based on the book, True Blue was released": Probably needs a bit of a tweak, as this could mean the book is called TB (I know is also is, but you see what I mean!) Possibly "a film of the same name"?
Done something similar, not quite the same name so just piped it. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Four years earlier": is there any merit in starting with Clark, then going on to Topolski, to keep a sense of chronology?
Reordered and reworded accordingly. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 10:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated. Once I'm out of work, I'll take a closer look. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:38, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers again, I'll GAN it and see where we go from there. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Port/Starboard vs Strokeside/Bowside

Given that this is about (mostly) British rowing, should strokeside/bowside be used rather than port & starboard?TrulyBlue (talk) 15:47, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I just used what the reliable sources said. Feel free to amend. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

I wonder if given that Colin Moynihan was a sitting Member of Parliament at the time of this race, the Umpire section in the infoxbox should say "Colin Moynihan MP"? Dunarc (talk) 23:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]