Talk:The Beresford/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bruxton (talk · contribs) 22:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

• Happy to review this one. Bruxton (talk) 22:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Questions

Y Might need to change "Each grouping is flanked by brick pilasters and are topped by a triangular broken" to "is" instead of are.

Y I am not familiar with "infilled" in the sentence "The arches were originally open-air openings but were infilled with windows" but it is a word so probably ok.

Y Cooperative conversion - "two years on renovating" probably remove the word "on"

Y Seven images, sadly none of the interior or the lobby

Thanks for the review @Bruxton. I've fixed all of these now. – Epicgenius (talk) 23:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

If I have not said it before, it is a pleasure to read and review your articles. I will certainly review a few more before this latest drive is thorough. This article is in MOS:ORDER, well illustrated (interior would be nice) and has high quality sources. I try to imagine having a unit like the ones described in the articlem "Many of the apartments were duplex units that originally spanned multiple stories". I like your use of notes. Bruxton (talk) 00:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Citations

• Y Spot checked citations and Earwig only alerts to titles and tidbits 25.9%

Chart

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Yes
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Yes
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Yes
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Yes
	2c. it contains no original research.	Yes
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Yes
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Yes
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Yes
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Yes
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Yes
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	As noted above, interior images would be great to add at some point in the future.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Yes
	7. Overall assessment.	Top notch!

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.